Private Compensation Claim Part 2 a Humiliating Process

The process of making a private compensation claim should aim to reduce the impact of past traumas on the victims, prevent future harm, and seek justice. It appears that instead of helping, the situation is making things worse and putting the mental health of Islington Survivors at risk. These victims, who are already struggling with depression and other issues, are being forced to go through a trial-like experience once again, causing further damage. Regardless of their tactfulness, the Civil Litigation Solicitors Law Firm's approach is extremely traumatic and ultimately pointless. Civil litigation solicitors often fail to inform victims about the statute of limitations, leading them to have false hope and unrealistic expectations. The alleged victims experience and revisit trauma all over again, as they are faced with the prospect of their claim being rejected.

This is in addition to the state of limbo a victim finds themselves in as they wait to hear about the outcome of their petition. It is not unlike a new form of torture and humiliation, as the alleged victims are practically held hostage and their life is put on hold. The victims await (for several days) the outcome of what appears as a template process to an intrusive investigation into their past. The primary concern is that Civil Litigation Solicitors fail to inform victims upfront of the statute of limitations. On average, the victims of childcare abuse in Islington are currently between the ages of 45 and 66. The limitation period is three years after the incident or three years after the victim's 18th birthday.

The victims were 18 years old in 1995 and the legal statute of limitations has expired. It seems contradictory that Civil Litigation Solicitors initially claim to be able to obtain settlements for victims of child abuse in Islington. The solicitors should immediately state the hurdle of time limitations and all other obstacles as being unsurmountable. In one case, after urging a 47-year-old victim to share the details of her abuse, a letter was received from Leigh Day's solicitor, which specializes in civil litigation, confirming that the case of the child abuse survivor has exceeded the limitation period since they turned 21. What is the point of torturing the victims by putting them through the ordeal of relaying their abuse in detail and even more damaging instilling false hope? And why are Civil Litigation Solicitors still advertising their services on the issue as viable? Is it to further torture the victims as their lives are put on hold whilst they seek validation from an extended government body that has them on trial for crimes committed against them by government officials during their childhood? The fact that victims of Islington childcare abuse are on average between 45 and 66 years old must be reiterated. How can the seemingly insurmountable obstacle of 'time of limitation' be reconciled with the available statistics which portray civil claims as being successful? The sinister truth is that the methods used by Civil Litigation Solicitors force victims to revisit their traumatic experiences and reopen old wounds to prove the importance of the legal process through statistical analysis. As it stands applying for a private claim through Civil Litigation Solicitors Law Firm is a truly embittering process. I can’t say that I would in good conscience recommend this process to anyone, as it is stressful, and the outcome is uncertain at best.